Vertical Integration, Raising Rivals’ Costs and Upstream Collusion
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper analyzes the impact vertical integration has on upstream collusion when the price of the input is linear. As a first step, the paper derives the collusive equilibrium that requires the lowest discount factor in the infinitely repeated game when one firm is vertically integrated. It turns out this is the joint-profit maximum of the colluding firms. The discount factor needed to sustain this equilibrium is then shown to be unambiguously lower than the one needed for collusion in the separated industry. While the previous literature has found it difficult to reconcile raising-rivals-costs strategies following a vertical merger with equilibrium behavior in the static game, they are subgame perfect in the repeated game studied here.
منابع مشابه
Do Vertical Mergers Facilitate Upstream Collusion?∗
In this paper we investigate the impact of vertical mergers on upstream firms’ ability to sustain collusion. We show in a number of models that the net effect of vertical integration is to facilitate collusion. Several effects arise. When upstream offers are secret, vertical mergers faciliate collusion through the operation of a foreclosure effect: Cheating unintegrated firms can no longer prof...
متن کاملThe Effects of Vertical Integration on Competing Input Suppliers
Vertical integration is a booming phenomenon in many U.S. industries. Massive consolidation of the defense industry has left only three or four developers producing many of the components used in military platforms.1 Banking also is consolidating at a rapid pace, with integration of related financial services (insurance, credit cards) and input services (check clearing, payments, electronic fun...
متن کاملOn Vertical Mergers and Their Competitive E¤ects
It is well known that vertical integration can change an upstream producer’s incentive to supply the integrated ...rm’s downstream rivals. However, it has not been noticed that vertical integration also changes these rivals’ incentives to choose suppliers. This paper develops an equilibrium theory of vertical merger that incorporates strategic behaviors in the input market of both the integrate...
متن کاملVertical Integration and the Risk of Information Leakage
accepted by antitrust practitioners: vertical mergers were harmful to competition, for vertically integrated firms have incentives to raise their non-integrated downstream rivals’ costs to soften competition. This view was challenged by the Chicago school authors in the 1970s on the ground that integrated firms cannot leverage market power from the upstream market (input market) to the downstre...
متن کاملThe Effects of Vertical Integration on Competing Input Suppliers
When a downstream firm buys an input supplier, the downstream firm can reduce its costs of using that input. Other input suppliers typically respond by pricing more aggressively, given the demand reduction, which tends to lower input supply costs to other firms. Thus a vertical merger may lower rival's costs, rather than raise them. ∗ I have benefited from the comments of Joe Haubrich and Willi...
متن کامل